Re: No ~ operator for box, point

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: No ~ operator for box, point
Дата
Msg-id 18739.1172621096@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: No ~ operator for box, point  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> Is there any reason not to make these casts implicit?

To the extent that you're trying to provide operators that should be
indexable, that won't solve the problem.

I'm unconvinced that these casts should be implicit anyway, as the types
are really considerably different than, say, int2 and int4 --- there are
no operations on int4 that "don't make sense" for an int2, the way there
are for polygon vs. box.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option