Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2?

t-ishii@sra.co.jp writes:
> I have successfully built 6.3.2 under Sparc/Solaris 2.6 with gcc
> 2.7.2.2.  Here are the outputs from gmake.

OK, that seems sufficient evidence that Solaris 2.6 *does* have proper
declarations for all these functions in the system include files.
So we're left with the hypothesis of a botched gcc installation
on De Clarke's machine.  I'm not quite foolish enough to say that
it couldn't be anything else, but that sure seems like the thing
to investigate first.

            regards, tom lane