Re: On disable_cost
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On disable_cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1871ece0cc369fddcf89a4e1cbb778db75e2e8c6.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On disable_cost (Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: On disable_cost
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 18:12 +0300, Alena Rybakina wrote: > > > However you are right that this display will not appear for all > > > nodes that only contain a data collection procedure, such as Append, > > > MergeAppend, Gather, etc. And I agree with you that we should > > > information about it. I also think it’s worth adding additional > > > information that this option does not appear in the postgres_fdw > > > extension. > > > > I cannot quite follow that either... > > I meant this [0]. > [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpMyKJpLGWRmR3%2B3g4DxrSf6iRpwTRCXMorU0HvgWbocw%40mail.gmail.com > > Th disabled description won't display if the MergeAppend and Append > nodes are used in the query plan. I tried to generalize it, but without > success. I'm not sure that these nodes can be called accumulating data. > But I tried to describe this case in the documentation. You mean you rediscovered the bug that David's patch fixes? > About postgres_fdw extension disabled nodes won't show [1]. I think we > should add information about it too. > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZRwy8202vxbUPBeZd_Tx5NYVtmpvBnJnOzZS3b81cpkg%40mail.gmail.com You cannot disable a foreign scan... Or do you want to see "disabled" if the remote query uses a disabled node? I think that would be out of scope... Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: