Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18683.1297455030@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Why do we have to involve the whole of PostgreSQL? Since the only piece
> that links to libreadline is psql, perhaps we could fix this by having
> only psql optionally use GnuTLS.
We have code that exists in both psql and the backend (cf src/port/)
so I'm not sure this really will satisfy the more rabid GPL partisans.
And this whole discussion is about satisfying the most rabid of them,
remember. I don't really think that anything other than "relicense all
of Postgres as GPL" will make them happy.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: