Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18647.967496710@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts) (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> What is the status of this querytree redesign ?
Waiting for 7.2 cycle, as far as I know.
> The things the new querytree should address sould be (at least ;) -
> 2. WITH RECURSIVE
I don't think RECURSIVE is a querytree issue --- it looks like a much
bigger problem than that :-(
The things I'm concerned about fixing with querytree redesign are* full SQL92 joins* subselects in FROM* view bugs
(groupingand aggregates in views)* INSERT ... SELECT bugs* reimplement UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT in a less hacky way,
makecases like SELECT ... UNION ... ORDER BY work. Not to mention UNION etc in a subselect or in INSERT/SELECT.*
convertWHERE x IN (subselect) to a join-like representation
These are all things that have gone unfixed for years because they're
essentially unfixable with the current single-level representation of
a query.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: