Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET
Дата
Msg-id 18633.1587129736@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET  (Jeremy Morton <postgres@game-point.net>)
Ответы Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeremy Morton <postgres@game-point.net> writes:
> Surely the fact that you'll lose data if you try to store a common 
> .NET datatype with any kind of ORM (eg. EF, which is pretty popular) 
> right now, using "the world's most advanced open source relational 
> database", is reason enough to support it?

If the ORM somehow prevents you from using timestamptz, that's a
bug in the ORM.  If it doesn't, the above is just a hysterical
claim with no factual foundation.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications