Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Дата
Msg-id 1863.1552165593@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> writes:
> Hope about  keeping the default unit of ms, but converting it to a 
> 'double' for input, but storing it as int (or long?) number of 
> nanoseconds.  Gives finer grain of control withouthaving to specify a 
> unit, while still allowing calculations to be fast?

Don't really see the point.  The only places where we do any calculations
with the value are where we're about to sleep, so shaving a few nanosec
doesn't seem very interesting.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement