> Okay, here are my results:
>
> Box 1: C180 (2.0 PA8000), HPUX 10.20
>
> Compile with gcc: all tests pass
> Compile with cc: two lines of diffs in geometry (attached)
>
> Box 2: 715/75 (1.1 PA7100LC), HPUX 10.20
>
> Compile with gcc: all tests pass
> Compile with cc: all tests pass
I haven't had time to look at this further yet, except to build 7.1RC3
a couple of times with the HP ANSI C compiler today:
PA-RISC 1.1 code (-Ae +O2 +DAportable): all tests pass
PA-RISC 2.0 code (-Ae +O2 +DA2.0 +DS2.0): geometry failures
I'm not sure how interesting these differences are anymore -- is there
anyone familiar enough with floating point to determine if the results
are acceptable (although currently unexpected :-) or not?
Regards,
Giles