Re: freeaddrinfo2 changes.

Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> writes:
>> If this is broken then it's probably not the only problem --- we rely on
>> sa.sa_family in other places.

> sa.sa_family is not the problem itself, the problem is that if
> you use getaddrinfo with AF_UNSPEC, you can get more than replies
> with more than 1 address family. You will get atleast AF_INET,
> AF_INET6 if they exist for what you request, and maybe AF_UNIX or
> even others.

Oh, I see --- the problem is to tell the difference between an AF_UNIX
addrinfo built by getaddrinfo_unix and one returned by the system's
getaddrinfo.  Okay.
        regards, tom lane