Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18528.1155842104@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>> ... Red Hat's present bugzilla system
>> could be described that way --- and while I can't say I'm in
>> love with it, I can deal with it.
> Doesn't bugzilla insist on sending you the complete bug every time?
Nope, it just sends the changes/additions. Other than the lack of a
direct email input method, I find BZ quite usable. Josh was just
complaining that its source code is a mess (dunno, haven't looked)
but other than that I think it's a definite possibility, just because
so many people are already familiar with it.
> Whatever system is used (if one is), there definitly needs to be some
> people looking over what comes in on the mailinglists (or on IRC, for
> that matter) and pipe it off to the tracker in case it's not already
> there.
Sure; we'd need a few volunteers handling that, no matter what software
we pick.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: