Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()

"David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> writes:
> On Oct 17, 2025, at 17:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> NO.  The rule is: if there's no such file, do not apply ABI checking.
>> We are not interested in ABI complaints against master.

> It only runs against maintenance branches.

That seems overcomplicated: how does the buildfarm know
what's a maintenance branch?  I think the rule should be
just "run ABI checks if the control file exists, else not".

As an example of why that's better, what if we did decide
we wanted ABI checks on master?

            regards, tom lane