Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
Дата
Msg-id 18456.1005962874@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Is it because we take a snapshot of the page before we write it in case
> we only write part of the page?

AFAIR, the partial-page-write problem is the entire reason for doing it.
If we could be certain that writes to datafile pages were atomic, we'd
not need this.

Of course we can't be certain of that.  But I'm wondering if there isn't
a cheaper solution.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)