Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I realize the transaction status varies from query to query, so that can
> be hard-wired into the protocol --- but the other ones seem mostly to be
> cases where you don't want the user changing something behind the back
> of the interface.
Right.
> If we give the interface more control, we don't have
> to report back the SET status.
That seems to be going in the wrong direction, though, in terms of
flexibility.
regards, tom lane