Christian Niles <christian@unit12.net> writes:
> On Oct 24, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Something involving a bigint identifier
>> would work better.
> If i understand correctly, you're implying here using a table that
> mimics the pg_largeobject table, but uses int/bigint identifiers
> instead of OID.
I was thinking of just a bigint primary key and a bytea data field.
You would of course have to fool with the bytea value instead of using
the LargeObject API; dunno how inconvenient this is for you.
regards, tom lane