Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18421.1364327149@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | spoonbill vs. -HEAD (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> I finally started to investigate why spoonbill stopped reporting to the
> buildfarm feedback about 2 months ago.
> It seems that the foreign-keys locking patch (or something commity very
> close to January 23th) broke it in a fairly annoying way - running the
> buildfarm script seems to
> consistently "stall" during the isolationtester part of the regression
> testing leaving the postgresql instance running causing all future
> buildfarm runs to fail...
It looks from here like the isolationtester client is what's dropping
the ball --- the backend states are unsurprising, and two of them are
waiting for a new client command. Can you get a stack trace from the
isolationtester process?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: