Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On July 10, 2015 4:16:59 PM GMT+02:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Would that propagate down through multiple levels of CASCADE? (Although
>> I'm not sure it would be sensible for a non-relocatable extension to
>> depend on a relocatable one, so maybe the need doesn't arise in
>> practice.)
> I'd day so. I was thinking it'd adding a flag that allows to pass a
> schema to a non relocatable extension. That'd then be passed down. I
> agree that it's unlikely to be used often.
Yeah, I was visualizing it slightly differently, as a separate
internal-only option "schema_if_needed", but it works out to the
same thing either way.
regards, tom lane