Re: Measuring the Query Optimizer Effect: Turning off the QO?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Measuring the Query Optimizer Effect: Turning off the QO? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1831.1562603368@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Measuring the Query Optimizer Effect: Turning off the QO? (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Measuring the Query Optimizer Effect: Turning off the QO?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> Two I'd particularly draw your attention to are
> Tom> join_collapse_limit and from_collapse_limit --- if you set both to
> Tom> 1, that'll effectively disable searching for a good join order,
> Tom> causing the join order to match the syntactic structure of the
> Tom> FROM clause. For instance "FROM a,b,c" will always be done by
> Tom> joining a to b first
> FROM a,b,c can always be planned in any join order.
Ah, right, -ENOCAFFEINE. What from_collapse_limit really does is
prevent flattening sub-SELECTs when doing so would add more join-order
freedom in the parent query. But ignoring sub-SELECTs, using explicit
JOIN syntax with join_collapse_limit=1 will let you control the
join order.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: