Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, this is a great help.  If you think it should be just one file we
> can do that, but since the are separate instructions sets, separate
> files I think still makes sense.

There is no reason for the i386 or AMD64 code to be different from what's
already tested on Linux --- the hardware's the same and the OS surely
doesn't make a difference at this level.

Does Solaris' assembler really support C-style "#if defined()"
constructs in .s files?  That seems moderately unlikely.

            regards, tom lane