Re: vacuumlo issue

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I see that patch has not made it to any released versions yet.
>> Is it too late to rethink the design?  I propose (a) redefining it
>> as committing after every N objects, and (b) having a limit of 1000
>> or so objects by default.

> I'll dispute the characterization of "utterly brain-dead"; it's better
> than what we had before, which was nothing.  However, I think your
> proposal might be better still.

Not hearing any objections, I will go make that happen.
        regards, tom lane