Re: Consistently use macro HeapTupleIsValid to check the validity of tuples in tablecmds.c
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Consistently use macro HeapTupleIsValid to check the validity of tuples in tablecmds.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 182145.1744208580@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Consistently use macro HeapTupleIsValid to check the validity of tuples in tablecmds.c (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Consistently use macro HeapTupleIsValid to check the validity of tuples in tablecmds.c
Re: Consistently use macro HeapTupleIsValid to check the validity of tuples in tablecmds.c |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: > Inconsistency is not good either though. I'm not sure it's worth the > churn, but I could get on board a patch to actually replace all > HeapTupleIsValid(tuple) calls with plain "tuple != NULL" checks. Keep > HeapTupleIsValid() just for compatibility, with a comment to discourage > using it. Would you then advocate for also removing macros such as OidIsValid() and PointerIsValid()? That gets into a *lot* of code churn, and subsequent back-patching pain. We had a discussion about that just recently IIRC, and decided not to go there. There's also the perennial issue of whether to write "if (foo != NULL)" or just "if (foo)". I'm not sure it's worth trying to standardize that completely. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: