Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I propose to add an equivalent to unconstify() for volatile.  When
> working on this, I picked the name unvolatize() mostly as a joke, but it
> appears it's a real word.  Other ideas?

Umm ... wouldn't this amount to papering over actual bugs?  I can
think of legitimate reasons to cast away const, but casting away
volatile seems pretty dangerous, and not something to encourage
by making it notationally easy.

            regards, tom lane