Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there
Дата
Msg-id 18094.994860017@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Partial indices almost there  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Does somewhere check for duplicate oids?

The duplicate_oids script in the same directory.

In practice, what really matters is that no two entries in the same
system catalog have the same OID; it wouldn't matter if we had, say,
the same OID used by a pg_proc and a pg_am entry.  In some catalogs
it doesn't matter at all because we never do lookups by OID (this is
true for pg_attribute, for example *).  We have a unique index on OID
on every system catalog where it matters, and ultimately that is what
ensures validity of the OID assignments.  Keeping the hand-assigned
OIDs unique across the whole system is just a matter of neatnik-ism.

            regards, tom lane

* In fact, Patricia Holben noticed awhile back that there *are*
duplicate OIDs in pg_attribute, in all releases <= 7.1.  This was caused
by a bug in the code that creates pg_attribute rows for multi-key
indexes: it put the same OID on each such row.  This is fixed in current
sources, but it's graphic proof that nonunique OIDs don't hurt when
they're not being used for lookup...

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Olivier Chapiteau
Дата:
Сообщение: dropping sequence with the table
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partial Indices vs. mixing columns and functions