Re: Question on OUTER JOINS.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Question on OUTER JOINS.
Дата
Msg-id 18085.1056815027@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question on OUTER JOINS.  (Ludwig Lim <lud_nowhere_man@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-sql
Ludwig Lim <lud_nowhere_man@yahoo.com> writes:
>    Is there way of rewritting :

>    SELECT  a.status,
>            employee_id
>    FROM   permission a LEFT JOIN 
>           ( SELECT * FROM employee WHERE employee_id
> =5) as b ON (a.status = b.status)
>    WHERE status='test'

> into a query that has no subselect in the FROM clause.

In this particular case you could do
   FROM   permission a LEFT JOIN           employee b ON (a.status = b.status AND b.employee_id=5)   WHERE
status='test'

which AFAICS would give the same answers.  As Bruno points out,
you can't move qualification conditions up and down past outer
joins without changing the answers in general.  But the above
change is okay: either way, A rows that don't match to a B row
with employee_id=5 will be emitted with nulls instead.

However, in this particular case I don't see why you're bothering.
If the sub-SELECT can be flattened, the planner will generally do
it for you.  I'd expect the first form of the query to give the
same plan (in pre-7.4 releases, maybe even a better plan) as the
second.

Perhaps you're showing us an oversimplified version of your
real problem?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question on OUTER JOINS.
Следующее
От: Tomasz Myrta
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres - Delphi Application