Re: [BUGS] BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18082.1507647266@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote:
> ... I'm a bit hesitant to put a GetSnapshotData
> call into ProcessIncomingNotify, because of the possibility of adding a
> lot of contention on the ProcArray if there's very heavy notify traffic.
Wait, I have an idea. Let's fetch a snapshot at the top of
ProcessIncomingNotify, and then use the snapshot to decide whether
xids are running, instead of calling TransactionIdIsInProgress.
GetSnapshotData is probably a bit heavier than a single
TransactionIdIsInProgress call, but if we have to process multiple
messages then this should be a net savings in ProcArray traffic.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: