Re: add_path optimization

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm interested, but I need maybe a 1GB data set, or smaller.  The
> thing that we are benchmarking is the planner, and planning times are
> related to the complexity of the database and the accompanying
> queries, not the raw volume of data.

In fact, the only reason to care whether there is any data in the DB
*at all* is that you need some realistic content in pg_statistic.
So it should be possible to set up a planner test DB with very little
data bulk, which would surely make testing a lot less painful.
        regards, tom lane