Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18072.1234802639@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm a little bothered by this issue with respect to INSERT, UPDATE,
> and DELETE, since it's possible that I have permission to see rows but
> not updated them, and it would be a little weird if select and update
> with equivalent where clauses operated on different sets of records
> (although that can happen anyway, because of BEFORE triggers, and it's
> pretty irritating). It's not clear that there's a clean solution
> here, but it's at least food for thought.
80% of the problem here is exactly that the proposed solution doesn't
seem very semantically clean. And once we accept it we're going to be
stuck with it for a long time --- compare for instance the multiple
serious annoyances with RULEs, which we can't fix easily because of
backwards compatibility considerations.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: