Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?
Дата
Msg-id 18005.1137445327@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:52:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does anyone see a reason to keep this layer of struct definitions?

> If you cut it out, what will the "heap" and "index" access methods
> needed for SQL/MED use?

What's that have to do with this?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?
Следующее
От: "Jonah H. Harris"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?