Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18004.1237758380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> Le 22 mars 09 � 22:05, Tom Lane a �crit :
>> This seems drastically overengineered. What do we need two levels of
>> objects for?
> We need to be able to refer (pg_depend) to (system level) modules.
> Any given extension may depend on more than one module.
You really haven't convinced me that this is anything but
overcomplication. There might (or might not) be some use-case
for being able to declare that module A depends on module B,
but that doesn't mean we need a second layer of grouping.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: