Re: Which qsort is used
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Which qsort is used |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17991.1134687981@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Which qsort is used (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> I have a related question. qsort is only used in the postgres source in a few
> places. If postgres used an internal implementation instead of the library
> source it could have implementations that don't use function pointers.
There are calls to qsort in upwards of 40 different source files; many
of those files contain multiple comparator functions. Doesn't look like
"a few" to me. But I'll grant that the vast majority are not
performance critical. One could imagine putting a custom implementation
into only tuplesort.c, say, where you could certainly get rid of one
level of function call (qsort_comparetup) by providing a saner API that
passes a state pointer as well as a function pointer to the qsort code.
Whether that would be worth the trouble is a question for experiment ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: