Re: DEBUG messages

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: DEBUG messages
Дата
Msg-id 17936.1007647140@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DEBUG messages  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: DEBUG messages  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: DEBUG messages  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Added to TODO:
>     * Change DEBUG tag used in server logs
> Seems it should say NOTICE.

It had better *not* be a NOTICE, because there is no attached client
to forward the message to.

There is some confusion in the elog() design between message severity
level and message destination, viz DEBUG goes only to postmaster log,
NOTICE and up go to client and log.  And then we have a separate
DebugLevel variable that controls how many places will emit DEBUG
messages.  It might be better to unify this into a single mechanism.
Maybe replace
    if (DebugLevel > 2)
        elog(DEBUG, ...)
with
    elog(DEBUG2, ...)
and then have two GUC variables consulted by elog that tell the
minimum message level to send to the log and the client respectively.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gunnar Rønning
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: java stored procedures
Следующее
От: "Gregory Wood"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sparc v Intel