Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17912.1170787241@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> Is a test going to get added to the regression tests to catch similar
> regressions in the future?
I've been thinking about that. It seems that the regression tests have
fairly poor coverage of use of typmod-bearing data types in general;
most of our tests of complicated queries tend to use "simple" datatypes
like int or text. I don't have any immediate thoughts what to do about
that --- massive expansion of the tests doesn't seem justified --- but
this isn't the first bug we've hit in this area. It's just a bit more
embarrassing than most :-(
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: