Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
>> ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0.

> That was my original intention, however Magnus thought it best just to
> let it be queued and subsequently ignored by the backend - thinking
> about it 15 minutes later I can't for the life of me think why that's
> any better...

Are there any error cases that we would miss detecting if it didn't go
that far?

            regards, tom lane