Re: fsync vs open_sync
| От | pgsql@mohawksoft.com |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fsync vs open_sync |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17872.24.91.171.78.1092107131.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: fsync vs open_sync (Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: fsync vs open_sync
Re: fsync vs open_sync |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Just out of interest, what happens to the difference if you use *ext3* > (perhaps with data=writeback) Actually, I was working for a client, so it wasn't a general exploritory, but I can say that early on we discovered that ext3 was about the worst file system for PostgreSQL. We gave up on it and decided to use ext2. I have been considering a full sweep in my test lab off client time later on. ext2, ext3, jfs, xfs, and ReiserFS, fsync on with fdatasync or open_sync, and fsync off. One million inserts with auto commit.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: