Re: embedded list v2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: embedded list v2
Дата
Msg-id 17859.1348875543@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: embedded list v2  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: embedded list v2  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The reason I had the header declare DEFINE_ILIST_FUNCTIONS (or rather 
> ILIST_USE_DEFINITION back then) instead of reusing USE_INLINE directly is that 
> it makes it easier to locally change a "module" to not inlining which makes 
> testing the !USE_INLINE case easier. Does anybody think this is worth 
> something? I have no strong feelings but found it convenient.

Right offhand it doesn't seem like it really gains that much even for
that use-case.  You'd end up editing the include file either way, just
slightly differently.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Generalizing range-constraint detection in clauselist_selectivity
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: embedded list v2