Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17858.1116396952@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> What it comes down to is that a mailing list encourages many-eyes-on-
>> one-bug synergy, whereas Bugzilla is designed to send a bug report
>> to just one pair of eyes, or at most a small number of eyes. I haven't
>> used RT but I doubt it's fundamentally different.
> Actually RT is quite different. It's very closely tied to email. You get all
> the updates in email and can respond to the emails and the results are
> archived in the ticket.
[ shrug... ] BZ sends me email too --- for the things *it* thinks I
should know about.
The basic point here is that these systems are designed on the
assumption that there is a small, easily identified set of people
who need-to-know about any given problem. We (Postgres) have done
well by *not* using that assumption, and I'm not eager to adopt a
tool that forces us to buy into that mindset.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: