Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> * Is there any reason there is no RENAME TO command for operators?
> That might change the precedence of the operator
... true ...
> and get you in a big mess with stored expressions everywhere.
Not with respect to compiled expressions. It could conceivably break
stored function source texts and application-generated queries, but
those are broken a fortiori by the new operator name.
So I don't think this objection has a lot of weight.
regards, tom lane