Re: OWNER TO on all objects

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> * Is there any reason there is no RENAME TO command for operators?

> That might change the precedence of the operator

... true ...

> and get you in a big mess with stored expressions everywhere.

Not with respect to compiled expressions.  It could conceivably break
stored function source texts and application-generated queries, but
those are broken a fortiori by the new operator name.

So I don't think this objection has a lot of weight.
        regards, tom lane