Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
> I wonder if it would be better for readability to list these types in
> the order we check them in the code, as we did previously, i.e.:
The previous order seemed quite random to me, because enums aren't
container types and the reason for excluding them isn't really the
same. I thought about re-ordering the code to match the new comment,
but desisted. We could do that though...
regards, tom lane