Re: autovacuum scheduling starvation and frenzy

Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> I didn't add this patch to the commitfest, because it was just a point
> for discussion and not actually proposed for application.  But It
> doesn't seem to have provoked much discussion either.

> Should I go add this to the next commitfest?

> I do see it listed as a resolved item in
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.4_Open_Items

> But I can't find a commit that would resolve it, so does that mean the
> resolution was that the behavior was not new in 9.4 and so didn't need
> to be fixed for it?

It looks to me like Robert added that item to the "open items" page,
but he put it at the bottom --- ie in the "already resolved items"
list:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_9.4_Open_Items&diff=22417&oldid=22380

Probably this was a mistake and it should have gone into the still-to-do
list.
        regards, tom lane