Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think both Stephen and I are saying we don't see merit in that.
>> Moving around pre-existing functions won't accomplish much except
>> causing include-list churn. �Let's just standardize the names/APIs
>> and be done.
> Where do we put the new functions?
Probably in files that are already concerned with each object type.
regards, tom lane