Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17721.1467082544@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> I had couple of questions [1] related to that patch. See if you find
> those as relevant?
I do not think those cases are directly relevant: you're talking about
appendrels not single, unflattened RTE_SUBQUERY rels.
In the subquery case, my view of how it ought to work is that Paths coming
up from the subquery would be marked as not-parallel-safe if they contain
references to unsafe functions. It might be that that doesn't happen for
free, but my guess is that it would already work that way given a change
similar to what I proposed.
In the appendrel case, I tend to agree that the easiest solution is to
scan all the children of the appendrel and just mark the whole thing as
not consider_parallel if any of them have unsafe functions.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: