Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT

Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl> writes:
> Does PostgresQL have some way to make update, insert and delete queries
> not return the number of affected rows? I know that in MS SQL one would
> use NOCOUNT for that.

Uh ... why?  Seems like a useless anti-feature.  Certainly suppressing
the count wouldn't save a noticeable number of cycles.

            regards, tom lane