Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Дата
Msg-id 17711.1267163715@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> writes:
> Now, you've reminded me of something: That one or more versions of tar have trouble with very long file/directory
names 
> I've run into this with one of the source trees we've been working in - was it here in PostgreSQL? Could this be a
culprit? 

I believe we dealt with that, by renaming some files shorter.  It wasn't
anywhere near the docs files anyway.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lou Picciano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Следующее
От: Oleg Serov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #4673: pl/PgSQL: Bug, when updating changed composite types.