Re: libpq object hooks
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: libpq object hooks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17642.1210951805@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: libpq object hooks (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: libpq object hooks
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest
> queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it
> be marked returned to author for more work?
So far I think it still falls within the category of allowing the author
to revise his work. I don't want to hold commitfest open waiting on
revisions of this patch, but as long as there's still other stuff being
worked through I don't see why they can't keep trying.
Just for the record, I would really like to close this fest before
PGCon starts. We still have a couple more days to get it done.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: