Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
Дата
Msg-id 17622.1493133234@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 04/25/2017 10:45 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I agree entirely that it's confusing as heck. +1 for inventing a new name.

>> Yeah.  I would have expected installcheck to just skip any tests that
>> don't make sense against an already-installed cluster.  I would not
>> expect it to run those tests against some cluster other than the
>> installed cluster.  That seems super-weird.

> I'm in the process of moving all the buildfarm tests to use check
> instead of installcheck, but in such a way that it doesn't constantly
> generate redundant installs.

But is that something only of interest to the buildfarm, or should we
do something in the Makefile infrastructure to make it more generally
available?
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitriy Sarafannikov
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Use SnapshotAny in get_actual_variable_range
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes