Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>>> Its handling of nulls is bizarre, too. I'm thinking this might be a
>>>> good time to abandon backwards compatibility and switch to a format
>>>> that's a little easier to read and write. Does anyone have an opinion
>>>> pro or con about that?
>>
>> BINARY COPY scared the bejeezus out of me, anyone using the interface
>> is asking for trouble and supporting it seems like a nightmare, I
>> would rip it out.
> Tom, just keep in mind that the format is documented in copy.sgml.
Not documented *correctly*, I notice. There are at least two errors,
plus the rather major omission that <tuple data> is not explained.
regards, tom lane