Re: Postgresql and multithreading
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17578.1034951318@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Postgresql and multithreading (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Re: Postgresql and multithreading Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we
>> should use it". The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong
>> end in these discussions.
> ... Now, it seems, that
> people don't want to answer questions at all as it's bothering the
> developers.
Not at all. But rehashing issues that have been talked out repeatedly
is starting to bug some of us ;-). Perhaps the correct "standard
answer" is more like "this has been discussed before, please read the
list archives".
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: