Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered

Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 1/24/2011 7:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given where we've ended up on what we want printed, I'm forced to
>> conclude that there is basically nothing usable in the submitted patch.

> I personally feel that if we could even add this for explicit Filter 
> conditions, people would be a lot happier.  While I agree that having 
> all the fancy stuff discussed in this thread would be nice, I don't 
> think they're worth postponing the Filter part to 9.2.

I think there's probably only a day or two's work involved in coding up
what I sketched.  If you were to commit to doing that pretty quickly,
I'd personally be happy to regard the patch as Waiting On Author rather
than postponed to 9.2.
        regards, tom lane