Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1756481.1754616845@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > It is v18 and HEAD are on par in terms of features, with only > 4eca711bc991 and 7b2eb72b1b8c requiring a cherry-pick, so perhaps we > should begin with that, before moving with more cherry-picks down to > v17 as the second step? > Any thoughts from others? Would it be useful to get that down to the > back-branches? I don't have a strong opinion about whether this is worth getting into the back branches. I do have a strong opinion that just before a release freeze is not the time to be pushing such changes into stable branches. Even after the release, I wouldn't touch v13: we have learned repeatedly that inessential changes made in a branch's final release are often sources of regret. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: