Re: UTF8MatchText
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: UTF8MatchText |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17562.1179455706@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: UTF8MatchText (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: UTF8MatchText
Re: UTF8MatchText |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Yes, I only used the 'disjoint representations for first-bytes and
> not-first-bytes of MB characters' feature in UTF8. Other encodings
> allows both [AB] and [BA] for MB character patterns. UTF8Match() does
> not cope with those encodings; If we have '[AB][AB]' in a table and
> search it with LIKE '%[BA]%', we judge that they are matched by mistake.
AFAICS, the patch does *not* make that mistake because % will not
advance over a fractional character.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: