Re: Darwin compile fixes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Darwin compile fixes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17543.1129177736@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Darwin compile fixes (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Darwin compile fixes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch (without wrapping). The
> change is to use "$(CXX) $(CFLAGS)" instead of $(COMPILER). Does this
> change break OS/X?
Since our configure doesn't define CXX, I'm having a hard time imagining
how it could fail to break it.
If we *did* define CXX, it would presumably point to g++, which would
also break things since our source code is not C++ clean.
Even more to the point, Darwin isn't broken now --- at least it works
fine on the powerbook I'm typing this on, and on the several OSX
machines in the buildfarm.
I would like to know what this patch is alleged to fix before even
considering applying it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: